Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1381

reference
193-tree-1
name
1381
tree-preservation-order

undefined

193-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.031596 50.865175)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.031540 50.865169,-1.031542 50.865181,-1.031550 50.865191,-1.031562 50.865199,-1.031578 50.865204,-1.031596 50.865206,-1.031613 50.865204,-1.031629 50.865199,-1.031642 50.865191,-1.031650 50.865181,-1.031653 50.865170,-1.031651 50.865159,-1.031643 50.865149,-1.031630 50.865141,-1.031615 50.865136,-1.031597 50.865134,-1.031580 50.865136,-1.031564 50.865140,-1.031551 50.865148,-1.031543 50.865158,-1.031540 50.865169)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL